May 1, 2003. MORE ON BOXES WITHIN BOXES
What follows is going to be confusing. But it'll all come clear. Ready?
The last thing any so-called democratic government wants is exposure of the fact that COERCION is how it ultimately keeps its power.
The best way to create the fiction that sovereign governments are in charge of world events is by making those governments
DOMINANT AND NASTY AND COERCIVE.
Such coercion is often cloaked behind various fronts of respectability and "devotion to the law."
Or to say all this another way, the more coercion a democratic government uses, the more it helps create the fiction that world events are controlled by governments.
Confused?
Good.
You're supposed to be. Because all this, however true it is, is a kind of gibberish. It is gibberish because we linger under the delusion that governments are really running the planet.
Whereas, in fact, global managers are running the planet, and the last thing they care about is ceding REAL power to individual governments.
BUT. Global managers - in order to conceal their own very large power - want to sustain the illusion that viable nation states are the primary forces at work in the world.
The truth is, all these nations, over time, draw closer and closer together as one GLOB.
Which is the goal of global management. One glob, united and melted, under the control of the few.
So as the US government continues to enact laws and regs which make it easier to spy on and arrest and quarantine and track and tax and disarm and drug people - called COERCION - more and more American citizens believe that this means the government is more and more in charge.
One on level that is true, but on a bigger level that is a myth. Because the American government is a part of a much more extensive network. The global managers.
And the more the American people believe their government is the source of all problems, the easier it is for the global managers to hide out and do their work.
In the simplest terms possible, the game is called CREATING BAD GUYS.
If you were a mob boss, wouldn't you love to have 15 or 20 underlings you could use to attract blame and hatred from the rest of your mob and from the public? While you rest secure and anonymous and very rich?
Yes. So you cultivate and even strengthen these 15 or 20 psychopaths and let them wreak their havoc within their own little kingdoms. You even let them get way out of control once in awhile and cross the street and mess up a few neighborhoods (Iraqs). You know that is good for you, bcause all the hatred and blame is going to attach to the psychos.
Meanwhile, you continue to exert your rule over the whole scene.
At a school not too far from the town where I lived, there was a kid named Bobby. Very, very bright. Affable, a little on the quiet side. He was running, on the q.t., a quite profitable sports-betting book. Among his reps, he used two guys, Eddie and Charley, who were weirdos. They liked to drink a lot and go nuts and threaten people now and then and cause general trouble.
No one knew Bobby's connection to Eddie and Charley. All the campus law enforcement came down on the heads of Eddie and Charley - but not because they were taking $$ for bets.
Bobby went unnoticed. He was the man behind the scenes.
And he stayed that way, because he had a few bad guys attracting all the attention. And because he paid Eddie and Charley and his other reps good money.
Eddie and Charley were Osama and Saddam.
And Bobby had a very interesting link to the faculty advisor to the student council. Bobby controlled this guy. The advisor was in hock to Bobby because he had a bad betting habit.
The more the students became annoyed at overzealous campus cops who were after Charley and Eddie and making new coercive rules of behavior for everyone, the better Bobby was doing. The students blamed their problems on the school administration.
The school administration was, in fact, more in charge of the campus than ever. They had to be the bad guy, right? Yes, but the ultimate bad guy was Bobby. He was using the faculty advisor to protect his betting turf. He was giving the faculty advisor, finally, a cut of the betting action. So now the faculty advisor was exonerated of all his debts, was out of the red into the black.
And Bobby was the global manager, the richest person on campus.
The global manager asks: Who am I going to use to attract blame and hatred? Who is going to be my fall guy? Who is going to become more powerful under my tutelage - and therefore an object of contempt? Who am I going to pay off? Who am I going to blackmail? How can I improve my own image?
The last I heard of Bobby, he was running some kind of charity.
Disclaimer - Copyright - Contact
Online: buildfreedom.org | terrorcrat.com / terroristbureaucrat.com