Index | Parent Index | Build Freedom: Archive

The Essence of Ghost Not and Primeval Stupidity

by Frederick Mann

The following is in addition to the Ghost Not material on the main Reciprocality page.
  • We humans have also developed consciousness, which we can utilize as a means to understand ourselves and physical reality better. Victims of Vaihinger's principle of the preponderance of means over ends will "flip an unreality switch in their minds" and claim that "consciousness is senior to physical reality."
  • In extreme cases, they claim that "reality is all in your head." If you argue with people of such persuasion you can usually get them to a point where, if you say to them, "If what you say is correct you should be able to walk through the wall!" and they'll respond, "We just did!"
  • If these people were to stand in front of an oncoming bus, they would be flattened. Whatever they might think about "consciousness being senior to physical reality," they get out of the way of the bus, or die. To survive they behave on the basis that physical reality is senior to consciousness.
  • From "Pragmatism and Humanism". Lecture 7 in 'Pragmatism: A new name for some old ways of thinking' by William James:
    "We carve out groups of stars in the heavens, and call them constellations, and the stars patiently suffer us to do so - tho if they knew what we were doing, some of them might feel much surprised at the partners we had given them... In all these cases we humanly make an addition to some sensible reality..."
  • The concept of "Truth" (depending on how it's used) may imply that the symbols we use to express "Truth" are senior to physical reality. How many humans have slaughtered one another on behalf of "The Truth?" From "Pragmatism and Humanism". Lecture 7 in 'Pragmatism: A new name for some old ways of thinking' by William James:
    "What hardens the heart of everyone I approach with the view of truth sketched in my last lecture is that typical idol of the tribe, the notion of the Truth, conceived as the one answer, determinate and complete, to the one fixed enigma which the world is believed to propound. For popular tradition, it is all the better if the answer be oracular, so as itself to awaken wonder as an enigma of the second order, veiling rather than revealing what its profundities are supposed to contain. All the great single-word answers to the world's riddle, such as God, the One, Reason, Law, Spirit, Matter, Nature, Polarity, the Dialectic Process, the Idea, the Self, the Oversoul, draw the admiration that men have lavished on them from this oracular role. By amateurs in philosophy and professionals alike, the universe is represented as a queer sort of petrified sphinx whose appeal to man consists in a idol of the rationalistic mind! I read in an old letter - from a gifted friend who died too young - these words: "In everything, in science, art, morals and religion, there must be one system that is right and every other wrong." How characteristic of the enthusiasm of a certain stage of youth! At twenty-one we rise to such a challenge and expect to find the system. It never occurs to most of us even later that the question 'what is the truth?' is no real question (being irrelative to all conditions) and that the whole notion of the truth is an abstraction from the fact of truth.,; in the plural, a mere useful summarizing phrase like the Latin Language or the Law...

    What shall we call a thing anyhow? It seems quite arbitrary, for we carve out everything, just as we carve out constellations, to Suit our human purposes. For me, this whole 'audience' is one thing, which grows now restless, now attentive. I have no use at present for its individual units, so I don't consider them. So of an 'army,' of a 'nation.' But in your own eyes, ladies and gentlemen, to call you 'audience' is an accidental way of taking you. The permanently real things for you are your individual persons. To an anatomist, again, those persons are but organisms, and the real things are the organs. Not the organs, so much as their constituent cells, say the histologists; not the cells, but their molecules, say in turn the chemists.

    We break the flux of sensible reality into things, then, at our will. We create the subjects of our true as well as of our false propositions.

    We create the predicates also. Many of the predicates of things express only the relations of the things to us and to our feelings. Such predicates of course are human additions. Caesar crossed the Rubicon, and was a menace to Rome's freedom. He is also an American school-room pest, made into one by the reaction of our schoolboys on his writings The added predicate is as true of him as the earlier ones.

    You see how naturally one comes to the humanistic principle: you can't weed out the human contribution. Our nouns and adjectives are all humanized heirlooms, and in the theories we build them into, the inner order and arrangement is wholly dictated by human considerations, intellectual consistency being one of them. Mathematics and logic themselves are fermenting with human rearrangements; physics, astronomy and biology follow massive cues of preference. We plunge forward into the field of fresh experience with the beliefs our ancestors and we have made already; these determine what we notice; what we notice determines what we do; what we do again determines what we experience; so from one thing to another, although the stubborn fact remains that there is a sensible flux, what is true of it seems from first to last to be largely a matter of our own creation."


    Index | Parent Index | Build Freedom: Archive

    Disclaimer - Copyright - Contact

    Online: buildfreedom.org | terrorcrat.com / terroristbureaucrat.com