9/11: Controlled Demolition as Propaganda - Part 2

The Players

Below are some of the players in the controlled-demolition-as-propaganda campaign.

• Super-baddie architects of 9/11
• Super-baddie prominent 9/11 figures
• Scientists pushing different theories
• Scientists helping to keep focus on controlled demolition while putting out either that there may have been real plane crashes or, there, in fact, were real plane crashes
• The commentators
• Israel! - The Dancing Israelis and the Israeli art project
• Loved ones and colleagues
• The victims of illnesses incurred at Ground Zero

SUPER-BADDIE ARCHITECTS OF 9/11

• In September 2000, a document was released by right-wing think tank Project for a New American Century (PNAC) stating that what was needed for America to dominate much of humanity and the world's resources was "some catastrophic and catalysing event - like a new Pearl Harbor." This could easily be a document designed simply to make the anticipated truthers believe that the perpetrators had no qualms about killing citizens in order to succeed in their quest for global supremacy. Would they really produce such a blatant document otherwise? In fact, they were absolutely truthful in stating that it would be a new Pearl Harbour. Both 9/11 and Pearl Harbour, like several other events, involved bombing of evacuated areas.
• In April 2001, a classified document detailing plans for false-flag operations in the 1960s code-named Operation Northwoods (containing some of the elements of 9/11) was released on the internet. This document may well be real, however, its release date is interesting.

SCIENTISTS PUSHING DIFFERENT THEORIES
What controlled opposition do to undermine truth is set up theatrical situations of divergence, for example, there is a group, Scholars for 9/11 Truth, led by James Fetzer which split off to another group, Scholars for 9/11 Truth & Justice, led by Steven Jones. Both these people are controlled opposition. We can make the assumption that any serious scientist who recognises controlled demolition will also recognise that the plane crashes were faked as evidence from multiple angles is provided but we need only the clear contradiction of Newtonian physics of alleged footage of 200-ton airliner melting into a 500,000-ton steel frame skyscraper ... with the truly in-your-face lie of the nose cone.popping out the other side of the building.

SCIENTISTS KEEPING FOCUS ON CONTROLLED DEMOLITION - KEY PLAYER, ARCHITECTS & ENGINEERS FOR 9/11 TRUTH
When I wrote to AE9/11 in regard to the plane crashes they responded with a video made by 9/11 truther, Anthony Lawson, who disputes the no-planes theory, supporting their position. I cannot be certain if Lawson was controlled opposition or genuine. If genuine, with regard to his argument about the planes, he's what's known as a "useful idiot", that is, he has been fooled by the controlled opposition and is helping propagate their arguments. In his video, he talks about possible different percentages of deceleration, however, it doesn't matter what percentage of deceleration the footage shows, we can tell instinctively it is simply not sufficient in the case of a collision between a 200-ton airliner allegedly travelling about 500 knots (which pilots say is an impossible speed close to ground level) and a 500,000 ton steel frame building (99.96% difference in weight). When a 1,600kg medium sedan crashes into a 15,000kg light-weight empty semi-trailer (a much lower 89.34% difference in weight) at only, say, 100mph the rate of deceleration is very, very obvious and to the eye simply looks almost like a stop. At this point in the video he says "... which shows the explosion developing and what must be a smoking engine arcing its way down to Murray St." This is rather hilarious: to think an engine has gone all the way through the 500,000-ton tower to sail down on the other side of the building.

The reason the focus is kept on controlled demolition rather than planes is that planes make it all too simple: fake planes means controlled demolition of buildings and also means right off the bat, 265 people did not die in plane crashes which prompts the question: if those 265 deaths were faked why not the other 2,735.

THE COMMENTATORS
I think many commentators who reveal significant truth about 9/11 but who always direct away from staged death and injury are controlled opposition. I won't name names, however, because it is very difficult to be sure if someone whether someone is spreading disinformation or is is simply genuinely misguided. One person I'll name, because the evidence is clear, is James Corbett. In an open letter to James Corbett, Allan Weisbecker points out James' mention of Flight 77 eleven times in his talk at the 9/11 Kuala Lumpur conference. Allan claims that, while rubbishing the missile-into-the-Pentagon theory, James' frequent mention of Flight 77, without actually saying it went into the Pentagon tends to suggest it and I agree.

ISRAEL
Of course, Israel was involved as we can infer other nations were but the focus on Israel is all distraction propaganda as all was done under the auspices of the US government and they are the primary focus. A great deal is written about the Dancing Israelis, who allegedly were seen celebrating when the towers came down and who then had their van stopped at a roadblock which was found to contain explosives dust (yeah, right) and the Israeli student art projects, one of which involved students' occupation of the 90th floor and the removal of windows. This may have had some purpose related to the events of 9/11 but regardless, it functioned as distraction propaganda too.

THE LOVED ONES, COLLEAGUES AND WITNESSES
There are a number of loved ones and colleagues. See Point 5 for example of loved one, Bob McIlvaine and witness, William Rodriguez

Disclaimer - Copyright - Contact

Online: buildfreedom.org | terrorcrat.com / terroristbureaucrat.com