Next Page | Contents | IRS Abuse Reports | Profound Honesty | Previous Page
On June 18, 1993, the Solicitor General of the United States, Drew S. Days III, in a last-minute maneuver submitted a typo-ridden continuance motion to the United States Supreme Court to stop the use of Wallace's honesty oath. That motion was granted by Supreme-Court Justice Sandra Day O'Connor. Indeed, many people in government already know that fully integrated honesty will reveal that subjective laws are nothing more than manipulative devices serving harmful political and ego agendas.
The retrial in August 1993 prepared the way toward establishing rationality and objective law as the standard for law. The second appeal provides the foothold needed to hoist the Neo-Tech/Golden-Helmet dynamic into public view. That dynamic will eventually eliminate subjective political-agenda laws, arbitrary ego "justice", and dishonest torts throughout the legal systems of this world.
Truth-Oath TestimonyDishonest I saw John O'Grady premeditate and then purposely kill a man. Conclusion: John O'Grady is a murderer. He should be jailed.
Unjust conclusion.
Honesty-Oath TestimonyHonest I saw John O'Grady save a platoon of men in 1944 during the Battle of the Bulge at Bastogne, Belgium. Trapped beneath a snow-covered ledge by a Nazi machine-gunner, John premeditated a plan. He then scaled an icy cliff. Wounded twice, John shot and killed the machine-gunner. He saved the twenty men in his platoon. Conclusion: John O'Grady is a hero. He should be honored.
|
Without an anchor to honesty, anyone can manipulate truth and facts into harmful agendas. Politicians who make self-serving laws and lawyers who profit from those harmful laws live by manipulating truth. They talk about truth all the time. But, they seldom, if ever, talk about honesty. For, unlike truth, everyone knows the exact meaning of honesty. Honesty is a process that has the same clear, fixed meaning for everyone. Honesty cannot be manipulated. One is either honest or not. Therefore, a shield of silence about honesty exists among politicians and lawyers. Indeed, they fear and avoid fully integrated honesty.[ 10 ]
This retrial was not about taxes. It was about camouflaged irrationality. It was about armed bureaucracies destroying Golden Helmets. It was about draining wealth and life from society and the populace to provide a few parasitical elites and their supporters with harmful livelihoods, false egos, and illicit power. It was about camouflaged dishonesty that has spread throughout our government, educational system, courts, and society.
Yet, from this retrial arose the dynamics to vanish Plato's 2300-year-old, parasitical-elite class. Indeed, this retrial established the groundwork for eliminating subjective law and ego "justice", starting with a motion to prohibit subjective courtroom bias -- a motion summarily denied by Judge Lloyd D. George.
| The following motion was filed with the U.S. District Court on June 28, 1993. Below are various descriptive, "the-point" portions of its arguments. The technical, "a-point" portions are not included, but are available from the court files. |
This motion proposes introductory jury instructions by the judge to assure a trial free of subjective, courtroom bias.
Comes now Frank R. Wallace with a motion to the court for preliminary jury instructions relating to courtroom bias. Such instructions shall be in the form presently provided in the Manual of Model Criminal Jury Instructions for the Ninth Circuit under "What is admissible evidence? What is inadmissible evidence?" The following activities by the United States Government shall not be considered as evidence, but shall constitute inadmissible evidence:
This motion asks the court to prohibit the infliction of subjective biases on the defendant, before and during the trial. For, the infliction of such biases directly violates the defendant's Fifth-Amendment rights. Indeed, all due-process, constitutional, and human rights eventually vanish under subjective courtroom biases, as clearly observable in the evolvement of totalitarian governments.
Tradition or habit that has been practiced even for "hundreds of years" offers no argument against this motion. For, tradition or "the test of time" is no gauge of value or validity. Ten centuries ago, status-quo tradition or biases led the Western World into a dark millennium of stagnation and human misery. The subsequent Renaissance, the American Constitution, and the Industrial Revolution emerged only after discarding the irrationalities of subjective biases and overthrowing many force-backed, political/religious-agenda laws.
That discarding of subjective biases unleashed a flood of new knowledge and life-enhancing values. Stunning advances arose from the honesty, objectivity, and efforts of courageous giants like Leonardo da Vinci, Copernicus, Galileo, Spinoza, Newton, Jefferson, Darwin. Each such hero overturned subjective truths and laws based on biases, traditions, dogma.
Now is the time for the court to end criminal enforcement of self-serving political agendas backed by subjective laws, ego "justice", and armed bureaucracies. Now is the time to establish a new legal foundation based on objective law backed by integrated honesty. Now is the time for courageous judges to usher in the golden age of objective law that brings everlasting peace and prosperity to everyone and society.
| The above motion to prohibit subjective biases and ego "justice" in the courtroom was summarily denied by Judge Lloyd D. George on July 14, 1993. The motion was then orally resubmitted on August 2, 1993. Judge George again brusquely denied the motion to eliminate courtroom biases and ego "justice" from his courtroom. |
Human nature requires being or learning to be a net value producer for others and society. As Socrates identified, human nature requires honesty and objective law for expanding prosperity and happiness. By contrast, parasitical elites must build corrupt ego-"justice" systems to enforce the political agendas needed for their survival. Only by disintegrating the sacred trinity of rationality, honesty, and objective law can they enforce their parasitical agendas. And, unless eliminated, such parasitism eventually destroys its twin hosts -- the economy and its value producers.
In other words, with objective law, the first priority of prosecutors and judges is to bring forth all and only the contextual facts needed to render justice. In that way, objective law protects the innocent value producer and prosecutes the guilty value destroyer, which is the entire purpose of objective law and justice.
By contrast, with subjective political law and its ego "justice", the first priority is to obtain convictions that protect the political agendas supporting a growing class of parasites throughout the government and the legal profession. Judges and lawyers must becloud honesty while manipulating truth to punish, convict, or eliminate political-agenda threats. Enforcement of political agendas by suppressing objective law is required to support the parasitical-elite class and its ego-"justice" system. Such corruption is demonstrated in every courtroom used to enforce political-agenda laws rather than to uphold objective law.
Next Page | Contents | IRS Abuse Reports | Profound Honesty | Previous Page
[ 9 ] U.S. vs. Wallace, 989, F.2d, 1015 (9th Cir. 1993).
[ 10 ] Dr. Wallace presented his own case in both trials. But, Wallace's supporters tried to hire a lawyer for the sole purpose of cross-examining and impeaching the prosecution's paid informant. Four lawyers, in turn, accepted and then withdrew when they discovered the honesty principle underlying the Golden-Helmet trial. ...Those lawyers feared for their own ego-"justice"-dependent careers if they helped a defendant combat ego "justice".
[ 11 ] Also see Legal Exhibit titled Ego-"Justice" Terminator on page 89.
Disclaimer - Copyright - Contact
Online: buildfreedom.org - terrorcrat.com - mind-trek.com