SINK THE B.O.A.T. AFTER 2001
|
When The B.O.A.T. Of Freeloaders Sank
YOU WERE WORTH MILLIONS!
Next Page | Contents | Previous Page
SINK THE B.O.A.T. AFTER 2001
|
Unbeknownst to us under the old code, our government wrongly carried a second purpose:
To understand why the second purpose was bogus, consider that it gave the 20th-century career politician the addictive, divine power to rule over us, which destroyed us and made him incapable of the second purpose to help us. He only made illusions that he was helping us to cover up the harm. Moreover, addicted to his power, the 20th-century career politician focussed foremost on his own political viability, thus on serving himself. Again, that made him incapable of the second purpose above -- to put out the dogged effort required to serve others. True, the career politician spent our money on entitlement programs that so-called "served the public good". But spending other people's money required no effort and could not really be serving the people, rather himself say through buying support. Only earning money required effort. Realize the difference between spending wealth, especially wealth earned by others, versus earning wealth: For example, imagine a lazy, young adult who never worked, but who inherited his fortune and recklessly spent that wealth in many self-indulging ways...versus the hard-working person who originally generated that fortune. The lazy self-indulger consumed massive wealth, and so did our 20th-century politicians. They consumed massive wealth -- our wealth -- for their self-indulging purpose of buying votes.
Civilization would have perished if everyone self-indulged in consuming wealth. Civilization needed people who generated wealth. Civilization succeeded to the extent hard-working people generated wealth and values for society. Those people put energy into society; the self-indulger just consumed and depleted that energy.
Career politicians lived in that reckless inheritance-like mode that nearly destroyed our society. They consumed the energy of the workers. They spent our money to disingenuously "serve the people" but really to serve themselves by self-indulging in their own political viability. Indeed, they irresponsibly consumed our wealth to buy votes for re-election. If not stopped, they would have eventually consumed all our wealth and depleted all the energy.
Moreover, 20th-century career politicians were like alcoholics who tried to draw everyone around them into drinking with them to feel better about themselves. Indeed, career politicians tried to get as many people as they could into the inheritance-like mode. You see, that made it all right. So our nation became more and more financially dependent. Toward the end of the century, entitlements and the budget grew out of control.
The market-driven businessman, by contrast, lived in the responsible productive mode that built society. He doggedly produced values to generate wealth, which genuinely served society. Indeed, only the market-driven businessman had demonstrated that he put out the dogged effort to serve the people.
[ 8 ] Why were taxes weighted so heavily -- 40 points? Taxes in the 20th century caused a great, great burden on business beyond what met the eye. You see, all money used to live and survive originally came from business. A company's employees had to experience a certain standard of living that delivered the most effective and efficient employees. The business ultimately had to keep up its workers' standard of living. If the government taxed the people more heavily, that burden ultimately worked its way back to the company as it had to keep its workers at a certain standard of living. In all, every tax everywhere caused a burden on the originator of wealth: business.
Next Page | Contents | Previous Page
Disclaimer - Copyright - Contact
Online: buildfreedom.org - terrorcrat.com - mind-trek.com