Next Page | Contents | Previous Page
Now, imagine if those forceful collection policies spread to the utility companies. In college, we may have called home a lot because we were homesick. Maybe we got a little carried away and later ran into problems trying to pay those big phone bills. What happened? The phone company simply shut off service. If, instead, the phone company and other companies collected like the CID, then their leaders would eventually grow lazy. No one there would need to meet reality and the ongoing nitty-gritty effort to produce a competitive value, for the money would automatically be there. If such a dishonest collection tactic as in the IRS spread to all institutions, including all businesses, then the fundamental responsibility of human existence -- producing values -- would end. With no more hard-working producers, everyone would just consume wealth. The economy would collapse. ...Throughout the second half of the 20th century, just one institution, the United States Government, caused the entire U.S. economy to increasingly struggle before the new code of the next millennium rescued the world.
Looking back from the 21st century, the nest of the old code was the CID -- the Criminal Investigation Division -- not the IRS per se (although the implicit coercion of the CID enabled civil auditors to impose cruel and unusual "loanshark" fines and penalties that delinquents had to pay off, possibly for the rest of their lives, or else face criminal investigations). Now, let us see why the CID was the nest of the old code. First, let us say someone in the 20th century was not paying his taxes. Under the new code, after 2001, that was OK. Those he owed money to simply shut off his services, whether the power company or the phone company or IBM or the government. He got a bad credit rating, was ostracized by many vital businesses with no more service and no more credit until he paid. No problem; he was a deadbeat, and everyone knew it. In the real world, he would have to shape up, or stay out.
But back in the 20th century, what if someone were sincerely unhappy with the lack of values being provided? What if he just did not want to pay because he knew it was not right...politicians and bureaucrats did not produce values. In fact, they destroyed values. So, he just did not want to pay politicians to build their divine power to rule over us and suppress society. Well, if not for forced tax collection, more and more people would have begun legally withdrawing. "Go ahead, shut off my services," they would have said. More and more people would have withdrawn until genuine values were provided.
If those people were not made into criminals, then no problem existed because alternatives and competitive services would have begun rising. With a rising demand to serve a growing, unhappy market, private entrepreneurs would have very quickly provided all the same services. Now the people would have paid competent market businesspeople for the services because now the people would have been happy with the production of genuine values. In particular, all those public-good programs that came from so-called "good intentions" would have been done right, for those programs would have finally benefited the people under market businessmen and women.
Next Page | Contents | Previous Page
Disclaimer - Copyright - Contact
Online: buildfreedom.org - terrorcrat.com - mind-trek.com