Neo-Tech Protection Kit, Volume I

Next Page | Contents | The Heresy Site | Previous Page

August 8, 1990

State of Nevada
Consumer Affairs Division
Mr. Ronald G. Shutt
2601 East Sahara Avenue, Suite 247
Las Vegas, NV 89104

RE: James Glick
(Address Withheld)

Dear Mr. Shutt,

Thank you for informing us of Mr. Glick's concern. If I had received your correspondence sooner, Mr. Glick would never have received his refund. As it is, one of my subordinates sent Mr. Glick a refund check in full on July 30, 1990. Upon my review of the situation, that refund check should never have been sent. We should not have refunded on this maliciously damaged product. Mr. Glick taped his letter of correspondence to the specially treated, reverse-type hand-numbered manuscript cover of our $70 manuscript -- an otherwise resalable product. Even when gently removing the tape, the front cover of our manuscript separated, the cover sticking to the tape, destroying the hand-numbered manuscript.

Mr. Shutt, as you know, I & O is not in business for the sake of business. We use I & O as a mechanism to write, publish and disseminate literature designed to uproot and expose professional value destroyers throughout government and business. Because we never waiver from our goal, we work at a very low revenue over cost. We are not in business to make money per se, which every professional value destroyer we become involved with is beginning to realize. We are in business to distribute our works and to learn, study, and improve the data so we can reach more people.

With our jihad-like mission, we must make every dollar count. We spend about $65 to make a $70 sale. If someone returns a manuscript for a refund, we must be able to resell that manuscript. Of course, we take the loss if the manuscript was damaged in the mail. But, if the consumer maliciously damaged the product, an otherwise perfectly resaleable manuscript, we will not accept that. Mr. Glick destroyed our manuscript, and I would not have allowed a refund to be sent to him had I known about this sooner.

Since 1968, we have had only a handful of maliciously damaged products. And of our quarter-million customers, we occasionally encounter troublemakers such as Mr. Glick. His intention to damage our company is clearly demonstrated in his threatening letter to us dated July 2, 1990 (copy attached). Mr. Glick is obviously wasting taxpayers' money and everyone's time by pursuing this case. Thank you.

Sincerely,

Mark Hamilton
President, I & O Publishing Co.

cc: Dr. Frank R. Wallace

November 27, 1990

Jeffrey Klurfeld, Regional Director
Federal Trade Commission
901 Market Street, Suite 570
San Francisco, CA 94103
Phone (415) 744-7920

Dear Mr. Klurseld:

To aid in your investigation of Neo-Tech, enclosed is a published letter to Ms. Janet Steiger of the FTC. Also enclosed are two recent newsletters sent to a number of professional value destroyers in both government and business whom we are currently engaging or are planning to engage. These newsletters are also sent to various honest people in both government and business. For consolidation and efficiency, please direct any attack plans to our personal prosecutor: Assistant U. S. Attorney, J. Gregory Damm. His address and phone number are listed below.

Thank you.

Sincerely,

Mark Hamilton, Writer and Author

enclosures:
     1. 8/16/90 Neo-Tech letter to Steiger; 8/18/90 letter to Damm
     2. Politicians-on-Trial Neo-Tech Newsletter #1-2
     3. Neo-Tech Newsletter #4-1

1. Mr. J. Gregory Damm
     Assistant United States Attorney
     701 East Bridger, Suite 800
     Las Vegas, NV 89101
     phone (702) 388-6330

2. Ms. Janet D. Steiger, Commissioner
     Federal Trade Commission
     Pennsylvania Avenue at 6th street, N.W.
     Washington, D.C. 20580

August 18, 1990

Mr. J. Gregory Damm
Assistant United States Attorney
701 East Bridger, Suite 800
Las Vegas, Nevada 89101

Dear Mr. Damm:

I was happy to meet you and Ms. Camille Chamberlain in your meeting with my father last month.

For your reference, here is a report I am sending to the FTC. The FTC is one of my actions. But, could the current actions of the INS and FTC be connected in any way to the IRS trial? In any case, my father suggested that in the future perhaps some of the court cases we are moving toward with the INS, FTC, FDA, EPA, and the SEC could be consolidated for efficiency. ...By nature, Neo-Tech will be increasingly confronting and eventually engaging in court those professional value destroyers who are undermining their own bureaucracies, our government, and society.

Sincerely,

Mark Hamilton

enclosure: FTC document

Ms. Janet D. Steiger, Commissioner
Federal Trade Commission (FTC)
Pennsylvania Avenue at 6th Street, N.W.
Washington, DC 20580

Dear Ms. Steiger,

Ms. Steiger, what is the meaning of sending I & O a form letter by certified mail, signed receipt requested, about the 30-day shipping rule? What is the hidden agenda? Is this some sort of setup? After this official "warning", is the FTC next planning a malicious fishing expedition to "sock it to us"? Does our reprinted-without-permission memo inserted into our test mailing pieces that denounces the bogus, destructive nature of the FTC have something to do with this? Can the FTC sneak around the first amendment to "get" I & O? Is this the start of a temper-tantrum retaliation to our memo about your abusive use of power?

Indeed, in all our 22 years of business, we have shipped out millions of manuscripts, books, newsletters, articles, and pamphlets to customers in the United States and in over 150 countries worldwide. We have always shipped within 30 days. For 22 years we have not had a single correspondence from the FTC regarding the 30-day rule, not even a single 30-day violation complaint from one of our millions of readers. Who else has such a fine record as I & O? Then, just two months after inserting the memo into our mailings (a wedge memo that embarrasses the value destroyers within the FTC), you threaten our company with an unprovoked, certified letter containing a mere form letter and photo copies of the 30-day rule regulation. Without even a customer complaint, you send a signed-receipt-requested certified package containing a form letter and your 30-day rule!

Just what is the real reason behind sending us this official, signed-receipt-requested warning? Now you have documented proof to carry out your hidden agenda. Go ahead and carry out that hidden agenda so that our writers can get to the bottom of your abuses of power. Let us uncover the FTC corruption of ostensibly "upholding the law" in order to destroy I & O's first-amendment rights.

For 22 years, I & O has delivered major scientific and philosophical values to society. Suddenly the FTC sends us an official "warning", just two months after inserting the memo that bears your name into our mass mailings. Why, after 22 years do you suddenly threaten our company with your 30-day rule and its $10,000-bludgeon fines designed for naked power usurpation by the professional value destroyers within the FTC?

Is I & O hurting society or is I & O delivering values to society? Perhaps you want to put us out of business because of our FTC memo. Perhaps you would like to harass and harm us to justify your livelihoods. Such bogus livelihoods only serve to diminish values, prosperity, and jobs being pumped into society by hard-working, honest value producers. ...Now, the memo that bears your name upsets one value destroyer. In turn, that one value destroyer begins her plans to put out of commission hundreds of honest, hard-working value producers and stop their flow of values into society. Or one evil value destroyer out to make a name for himself, Giuliani, for example, stops immense global values, hundreds of millions, perhaps billions of dollars and tens of thousands of jobs being pumped into society...to gain popularity for his political ambitions. Or one evil value destroyer out to take over a country, Ceausescu for example, kills many thousands of innocent value producers, all for some personal glory. Indeed, all professional value destroyers must be unveiled for who they are: people with Ceausescu-like souls who hurt society to any destructive degree they can get away with to increase their false power. Their bogus livelihoods are the greatest detriment to society. They not only reduce values, wealth, and jobs being pumped into society, but strip our rights through abusive use of power and lead toward the destruction of human lives -- all for the selfish greed of a few professional value destroyers too dishonest and lazy to produce genuine, competitive values for society.

Nevertheless, continue with your destructive hidden agenda to violate our first-amendment rights. Come and "get" us now! Use all your rules and fines that injure and cripple other small businesses daily, year after year. This time the outcome of your fishing expedition will be different from anything you have experienced before. For, uprooting professional value destroyers is our business. Step-by-step, leading to public-forum courtrooms, we will hold professional value destroyers in full view for all the world to see and then ostracize them out of existence.

Consider that you have received a number of phone calls from consumers about our memo that bears your name in our test mailings. (What exactly does that memo say? Turn to page 8n, Volume Two in the enclosed Neo-Tech manuscript.) That memo is reprinted without permission and inserted into our mass mailings. That memo directs public attention to the Commissioner of the FTC. Additionally, that brochure for Neo-Tech blackballs sales to and threatens the heart and soul of nearly all politicians, clergymen, and other professional mystics, bureaucrats, and authorities who impede the value producer. That brochure also exposes all academe and media people who twist facts out of context to undermine objective values. As we planned, you have already received phone calls from religious zealots and anti Neo-Tech crusaders complaining about that unnerving memo which mocks the false power of the corrupt FTC.

Why are we doing this? Ms. Steiger, peruse the Guns and Fists newsletters that you have received for the past several months. You will then know exactly who we are and why we are doing this. In fact, you will understand professional value destroyers who harm society versus value producers who benefit society. Our job is to drive a wedge between those who harm society and those who benefit society throughout government and business bureaucracies.

How do we drive that wedge? We drive that wedge into government bureaucracies by luring the professional value destroyers into an attack-mode against Neo-Tech (fully integrated honesty) value producers. Indeed, I & O is a group of honest value producers who benefit society. Today, businesses and their value producers are the subjects of professional value destroyers. Professional value destroyers justify bogus livelihoods by dishonestly regulating businesses and subjugating their heroic value producers. Of course, that false power to dishonestly regulate honest businesses (like I & O) and subjugate heroic value producers (like Leona Helmsley and Michael Milken) comes from the dynamic process of corruption (as explained in the "Politicians On Trial" newsletter, enclosed).

But, unlike other businesses, I & O is unique. We are a coterie of writers whose sole focus is to identify and expose those professional value destroyers in government and business who are undermining the happiness and well-being of everyone. Unlike other small businesses, we only grow stronger when harassed and attacked by professional value destroyers in and out of government. As elegantly expressed by Muriel Spark, author of Loitering With Intent:

I & O serves two functions: 1) I & O is our bait to directly engage professional value destroyers who exist by subverting the value producers. We pull those value destroyers into the Neo-Tech Matrix and then into the courtrooms. 2) I & O is our publishing machine to expose professional value destroyers around the world.

Consider how our one-two punch works: first we bait those value destroyers to come and "get" us into a public forum and eventually into the courts. That forum generates unerasable public records as we deliver our first punch: we show how these particular Giuliani-like people who "serve for the public good" are actually dangerous parasites on society who serve only their own greed for building a low-effort, value-destroying existence and a neurotic need for building false power. That Neo-Tech literature relentlessly and forever grows without a backward step. For the first time in history, with Neo-Tech, the man in the street can see through the illusions of the professional value destroyers. The public-forum courtroom allows us to generate high-leveraged literature to deliver our second and final knock-out punch: to mass market the literature around the world.

After growing strength for over two decades, I & O has honed and perfected the underlying integrations needed to clearly reveal those responsible for extracting values from society instead of injecting values into society. Contrary to their guise of serving society, those professional value destroyers are driven by selfish greed to extract easy, bogus livelihoods from society. Such people deliver the ultimate disservice to society. To camouflage their own selfish greed, they make the public believe that the true benefactors of society -- the hard-working, honest business-minded people -- are selfish and greedy who need to be regulated and controlled. But the opposite is true: The professional value destroyers advance their falsely created jobs and gain fake power in direct proportion to their dishonest control over and subjugation of value producers. ...Such value destruction subverts everyone's standard of living and happiness so that a few professional value destroyers can advance their careers of destruction. The value destroyers, not the value producers, need to be stopped. And I & O with Neo-Tech is going to stop those greedy and dangerous value destroyers, including those in the FTC.

Indeed, after two decades of growing strength, I & O has honed and perfected the successful distribution of its literature around the world. Consider the meaning of that accomplishment: A group of writers can clearly expose any individual or group of professional value destroyers and then successfully distribute the resulting literature all around the world from essentially any and all countries in the world. An unstoppable combination. ...Now, you can best understand our approach to bait and pull professional value destroyers into the courts to generate literature to distribute around the world.

Before I discuss your certified letter to us dated July 25, 1990, let me suggest that you read the enclosed "Politicians On Trial" Newsletter. That newsletter explains the legal problem with "truth" and a-point law (that leads to corruption) versus the incorruptible nature of "honesty" and the-point law (that leads to production). I & O is driving the wedge between the multiplying value destroyers versus the declining value producers within the government itself. Indeed, the government has both good people and bad people. Which side do you fall on? The corrupt, of course, control, regulate, and attack honest businesses to propagate their false power and bogus livelihoods. That corruption process is exposed in the "Politicians On Trial" Newsletter. ...I & O is going to end corruption throughout the government.

In layman's terms, I & O is the ultimate "corporate raider"; but this time we are raiding the professional value destroyers within the government. We are the ultimate in-the-trenches fighters who will drive out the corrupt value destroyers and cherish the honest value producers.

We have received your certified package -- your preparation for some hidden agenda inconspicuously signed by William S. Sanger on a form letter about the 30-day shipping rule. Your hidden agenda behind that certified package gives us reason to continue baiting the professional value destroyers in the FTC. Let me explain:

After two months of mass mailings that included the memo, we received no reaction from the FTC. That no-action response had driven us to a phasing out period of the memo bearing your name. Instead, we developed a new, more powerful brochure designed to draw out the corrupt value destroyers within the FDA. (See a partial sample of that brochure enclosed, the highlighted areas.) We even erected a huge, electrically lighted billboard across from the federal building designed to draw out the value destroyers within the FDA (photo enclosed).

Indeed, after several months of mass mailing, the memo undermining the false power of the FTC and having heard nothing from you or the FTC except what was related to us from customers who had called you, we began phasing out the reprinted-without-permission memo. However, since receiving the certified package, I have instructed our marketing bantam-company head to continue inserting the memo into our mass mailings in hopes to engage the professional value destroyers in your offices and to pull them into open courtrooms. We will use Neo-Tech to expose those FTC salaried value destroyers a little longer, until they conspire to come "get" us on some technical points (to which we have complied for 22 years). Will they come to "get" us with their hidden agenda in attempts to strip our first-amendment rights and stop our literature? Then, our writers can get to the bottom of this corruption in the FTC, and our marketers can send that exciting literature to our millions of readers throughout the country and around the world.

If I were sitting before you now, face to face, I would ask you to look at the logo on your FTC letterhead and then look me in the eye. Justice? ...Yes, Ms. Steiger, justice. I & O and its uncompromising use of fully integrated honesty will bring all professional value destroyers to justice. With Neo-Tech, the time has come to serve justice on those within your organization who are harming society.

Sincerely,

Mark Hamilton, Writer and Author
I & O Publishing Company, Inc.

P.S. 1. Ms. Steiger, one of my roles as a writer for I & O has been to help sincere people who want to leave behind their careers as professional value destroyers, who want to leave behind camouflaged envy and deep-rooted resentment in order to abandon their value destruction and unhappiness in exchange for genuine value production and happiness. I help sincere human beings who want to serve society and never again harm society. I help them discover the celebration of life. Enclosed is my latest little book called "Happiness Forever". I hope you read the first few pages of "Happiness Forever". Those first few pages may forever change your life. Who knows, you may even discover a lifetime of happy, exciting romantic love with a future Neo-Tech spouse.

2. If you have any corrections or edit suggestions on this prepublication document, please contact me. Thank you.

Enc:
1) Neo-Tech Cosmic Power
2) "Politicians On Trial" Newsletter
3) "FDA Brochure"
4) Billboard Photograph (please return when finished)
5) "Happiness Forever"

cc:
William S. Sanger
Veda L. Martin

January 21, 1991

Mr. William Tkach
Consumer Service Officer
State of Nevada Consumer Affairs Division
1850 E. Sahara Avenue
Las Vegas, NV 89158

RE: Mr. A. Abate
Address Confidential
File #27338

Dear Mr. Tkach,

Thank you for your letter of January 15 regarding Mr. Abate. Mr. Abate has demonstrated that he is a liar and forges letters. On the advice of our attorney, we have filed a complaint with the U.S. Postal Inspector (copy enclosed) concerning the forged letter Mr. Abate sent to the Nevada Consumer Affairs Division. ( I am referring to the letter he initially sent to you that he had forged on a word processor as coming from I & O Publishing stating that we are not going to issue him a refund and that we are enjoying interest on his money, etc.)

Mr. Abate was issued a refund check #06220, Valley Bank of Nevada, for $67.50 on December 24, 1990, (copy of carbon duplicate enclosed). The check was mailed to him by first class mail that same day. Obviously, Mr. Abate would have received that check before he wrote you on January 4. If he wants to cash his check he can. But we are not going to continue playing this game with Mr. Abate. He appears to be out to "get" I & O Publishing because he disagrees with our literature.

I want to thank you for taking the time to write us a personal letter regarding this matter. It is a shame, however, that your time and our time is being wasted because of this dishonest manipulator.

Sincerely,

Eric Savage
Editor

January 21, 1991

Dear Postal Inspector,

We are lodging this complaint with the U.S. Postal Inspector on advice of our attorney.

Mr. A. Abate is using the U.S. mail in a fraudulent manner by circulating a forged document to libel our company. Mr. Abate ordered and paid for a set of our books titled Neo-Tech from us, I & O Publishing Co., on September 27, 1990. He then returned the books to us on November 1, 1990. We sent Mr. Abate a letter asking him to please send us a copy of his cancelled check so we could issue him a refund. Instead of sending us a copy of his cancelled check, Mr. Abate forged the attached letter as coming from us, I & O Publishing, stating that we were not going to issue him a refund and are enjoying the interest on his money.

Mr. Abate then sent this forged letter by U.S. mail to the Nevada Consumer Affairs, the Postal Inspector, and the Direct Marketing Association. Mr. Abate also enclosed other material with this forged letter indicating he disagrees with our philosophical literature and is out to "get" us. We would appreciate your investigating this fraudulent use of the mails.

Thank you.

Sincerely,

Eric Savage
Editor

January 21, 1991

Mr. Ronald G. Shutt
Chief of Enforcement
State of Nevada Consumer Affairs division
Las Vegas, NV 89158

RE: Mr. Warren W. Hanson
(Address Withheld)
File #27696

Dear Mr. Shutt,

We appreciate the CAD informing us of Mr. Hanson's problem of not receiving his books in the mail from us. But, we do not accept the threatening form letter you sent to us (copy enclosed). We will not respond to this type of threat for a simple postal delivery problem. If the CAD wants to write us another letter and ask us in a manner appropriate to this situation, we will gladly respond to that letter and tell the CAD what we have done to resolve Mr. Hanson's problem with the postal delivery.

Sincerely,

Eric Savage
Editor

January 31, 1991

Mr. Jeffrey Klurfeld
Regional Director
Federal Trade Commission
San Francisco Regional Office
901 Market Street
Suite 570
San Francisco, CA 94103

Dear Mr. Klurfeld,

I have read your letter of December 13, 1990, sent to Mr. Cline concerning our company and literature. According to your letter "The Commission has no investigation pending into the activities or products of Neo-Tech". Since you have discontinued further pursuit of Neo-Tech and I & O Publishing Company, we have decided to remove the memo containing Ms. Steiger's name and the FTC's address in our literature. Instead, we will now target other government agencies in which to push the Neo-Tech wedge between the value producers and value destroyers within those organizations.

Yours sincerely,

Eric Savage
Editor

September 17, 1992

Miss P. C. Titford
Assistant Director
Direct Mail Services Standards Board
26 Eccleston Street
London SW1W 9PY
UNITED KINGDOM

Dear Miss Titford,

Unlike any publisher in the U.K., we are dedicated to eliminating the parasitical-elite class worldwide. Our major objective is to eliminate harmful regulatory agencies and bureaucracies charged with enforcing political policies in direct contradiction to objective law.

On studying the enclosed literature, you will find every claim is not only backed by fact in full context, but is an understatement. The supreme value of Neo-Tech is also demonstrated in the sampling of reprinted letters from Neo-Tech owners worldwide.

Moreover, the enclosed two-volume Neo-Tech Protection Kit provides specific examples where we have been attacked by certain book-banning neocheaters in government, religion, and big business who feel threatened by Neo-Tech literature because Neo-Tech exposes their dishonest, value-usurping livelihoods. Ironically, every attack serves to increase the circulation of Neo-Tech in each such locality.

Please fill out the enclosed questionnaire in the ZON publication centerfold and return it to us so that we may provide the most accurate, updated information for the Neo-Tech ostracism/praise matrix. Also, please contact me if you understand our mission and wish to work with us to eliminate the parasitical-elite class in the U.K. Because of Neo-Tech, our anti-civilization will be gone and forgotten by the year 2000 -- totally replaced by the civilization of the universe. Finally, Miss Titford, please review this letter for any edit suggestions or input for future publication.

Sincerely,

Eric Savage
International Director

Enclosures: Neo-Tech Information Package, Protection Kit I & II, Neo-Tech Discovery, Pincer 2, Volume 2, Revolution Document 9, ZON 9B, Neo-Tech Report

cc: Mr. Jim Sheehy
File: NT Protection Kit, vol. I

P.S. Neo-Tech damaging consumer perceptions? The opposite is the fact. We have over 400,000 intensely dedicated Neo-Tech members worldwide (Neo-Tech is now published in twelve languages). Over 15,000 Neo-Tech members reside in the U.K. alone. Many U.K. residents are our most enthusiastic supporters. We have received hundreds of letters from U.K. Neo-Tech owners expressing the tremendous, life-lifting values they have received from Neo-Tech. A sampling of those letters is printed in the enclosed Neo-Tech manuscript. In fact, there are networks of Neo-Tech owners who conduct weekly discussion groups throughout the U.K. Also, several thousand U.K. Neo-Tech owners are lifelong members of RIBI -- The Research Institute for Biological Immortality.

October 30, 1992

Miss C. I. Pestana
Newspaper Union
PO Box 32003
Braamfontein 2017
South Africa

Dear Miss Pestana,

Re: Your fax of October 15, 1992, addressed to Ms. Renette Josling concerning Neo-Tech Publishing Company

Neo-Tech Publishing Company has been in business since 1968. We have over a half-million satisfied customers in 152 countries. In addition, we have over 1800 customers in South Africa alone. We are a well-known, established international publishing and direct marketing company. I am enclosing a trade and credit listing for your reference.

Also, enclosed is a copy of our 800-page Neo-Tech Discovery manuscript. Upon studying that literature, you will find that every claim is not only backed by fact and full context, but is an understatement. The supreme value of Neo-Tech is demonstrated in the sampling of reprinted letters in that manuscript from Neo-Tech owners worldwide -- including many from South Africa. In fact, many South African residents are our most enthusiastic supporters. We have received numerous letters from South African Neo-Tech owners expressing the tremendous life-lifting values they have received from Neo-Tech. In addition, several hundred South African Neo-Tech owners are lifelong members of R.I.B.I -- The Research Institute For Biological Immortality.

Miss Pestana, we cannot change the address in our ad from our Nevada office to a South African address. We are offering to send readers of Scope magazine information about Neo-Tech free of charge. This information, since it will be sent directly from our American office, can take several weeks in the post to reach respondents. If readers respond to a South African address, they will naturally expect this information to arrive in the post within several days. If readers respond to an American address, they will expect the information to arrive within several weeks. Thus, we would be doing a disservice to Scope readers if we list a South African address. In addition, we have been doing direct-mail business with South Africans from our American office for over 10 years. This has never caused any problems. To the contrary, we have over 1800 enthusiastic South African customers.

I also point out that we sent full-payment for this ad totaling R3,400.00 to Scope magazine in August. If our ad is not run in Scope within the next four weeks, please return our money.

Review the enclosed Zon publication. Unlike any publisher in South Africa, we are motivated and dedicated to eliminating the parasitical-elite class worldwide. Our major objective is to undermine and eliminate harmful regulatory agencies and bureaucracies charged with enforcing self-supporting policies that drain the productive working class. Please fill out the enclosed questionnaire in the Zon publication centerfold and return it to us so that we may provide the most accurate, updated information for the Neo-Tech ostracism/praise matrix. Also, please contact me if you understand our mission and wish to work with us to help eliminate the parasitical-elite class worldwide. Because of Neo-Tech, our anti-civilization will eventually be replaced by the Civilization of the Universe.

Finally, Miss Pestana, please review this letter for any edits, suggestions, or input for future publication.

Sincerely,

Eric Savage
International Director

Enclosures: Trade and Credit Reference sheet, Neo-Tech Discovery, Zon 9b, Rev. Doc.

cc: Mr. R. Minnaar, Advertising Director, Republican Press Ltd.

Renette Josling
c/o Annique

Ms. C. I. Pestana
Assistant Secretary
Newspaper Press Union of South Africa
PO Box 32003
Braamfontein 2017
South Africa

Dear Ms. Pestana,

Your decision of November 11, 1992, to censor Neo-Tech in South Africa because of its editorial content is shocking. Your decision to ban Neo-Tech is based on the fact that you do not agree with its ideas. Your censorship of ideas is just one step away from book burning and a return to a Dark-Age-like suppression of ideas and knowledge. As history amply demonstrates, no advanced civilization can long survive when ideas are censored. Of all organizations, the Newspaper Union should be in the vanguard of fighting censorship -- especially the censorship of ideas.

Your actions will be published in our literature. We are also forwarding copies of your decision along with the material that you censored to the World Censorship Watch as well as to the Censorship Watch Committee of the Booksellers Association in New York. Public exposure of censorship is the only way to combat such cancer.

Sincerely,

Eric Savage
International Director

March 27, 1993

Dear Dr. Handsfield:

On Monday, February 22nd, I paid a $75 office-visit fee for you to send a brief medical-status letter requested five months ago by my insurance company. That brief letter was the entire purpose of my previous fully paid visit late last year. But, you never sent that letter. Now, you again promised to promptly send that letter if I had a second fully paid visit. At that second visit, I also paid an additional $116 for a simple, in-house PSA blood test. The result of that test was promised in four days -- by Friday, February 26th.

After hearing nothing for several weeks, followed by several futile phone calls to your office, my wife had to make another appointment with you on March 22nd, simply to ask for the test results. For, if the test were positive, prompt medical action, even surgery, would be necessary. She also asked about that still undelivered, twice paid-for insurance letter.

Your sudden defensive tantrum over my wife's simple request for that long-delayed, paid-for information was startling ... and disturbing. In a childish pique, you dismissed her. You dismissed her without responding to her reasonable query about paid-for services never delivered. You dismissed her without providing the twice-paid-for letter, five months overdue. You dismissed her without providing any professional interpretation of those blood-test results. ...Such irrational behavior endangers the health and lives of your patients.

The medical profession has enough problems with people like Hillary Clinton without being undercut by such money-madness -- culminated by your ludicrous complaint about having to pay someone to type that one-paragraph, twice-paid-for insurance letter. What kind of an office staff do you have that cannot type letters? How can you practice medicine without the competence to deliver the most-basic, paid-for medical services? ... Or, were you trying to squeeze still more money out of the insurance company for those already paid services?

And finally, how is such harmful behavior possible from a medical doctor who has taken the Hippocratic Oath? Is the reason greed, laziness, or incompetence by you or your staff for whom you are responsible? Or, does another reason exist? During my last visit to your office, everyone's time was wasted as you loudly boasted at length to someone over the phone about your fast boat, your $60,000 sports car, and your mid-life-crisis problems. Well, you should not take your puerile "crisis" problems out on your patients who, after all, are paying for your fast boat, your expensive sports car, your crisis" indulgences.

Perhaps the way out of your self-esteem "crisis" is simply to grow up and seriously commit yourself to your profession. ... Please promptly send that twice-paid-for insurance letter with a copy to me along with an interpretation of the paid-for $116 blood test.

Sincerely,

John Flagg

August 19, 1994

Mr. Paul E. Feltman
Postal Inspector
P.O. Box 2707
Mobile, AL 36652-2707

Dear Mr. Feltman,

Thank you for your attached letter of August 3, 1994, concerning U.S. Magistrate Milling's request to be removed from the Neo-Tech political mailing list.

U.S. Magistrate Milling along with every federal judge in America and several thousand other government, political, and business people are on that list. That list and its mailings began November 3, 1986, and continues to grow. Those mailings neither sell products nor solicit funds. Every person on that list has become a part of the Neo-Tech dynamic that will eventually eliminate the irrational aspects of government and the judicial system by eliminating political-agenda laws and ego "justice".

Thus, in a accordance with our First Amendment rights, we continue to send political information to all people on that list. We would be grateful if you could provide us with any postal ruling that would deprive our right to mail political and job criticisms to tax-paid government officials such as Magistrate Milling. If you can provide such a ruling, we would like to cooperate with you on testing the constitutionality of that ruling in the courts.

Thank you for your cooperation.

Respectfully,

John Flint
Editor

enclosure: 1. Paul E. Feltman letter of August 3, 1994
                2.Latest Neo-Tech political mailing (8/19/94)

CC: Magistrate Bert W. Milling Jr.
       U.S. Courthouse
       113 St. Joseph Street, #427
       Mobile, AL 36602

August 19, 1994
(Certified Mail #P 813 085 999)

Judge Walter Smith
U.S. District Court
P.O. Box 1908
Waco, TX 76703

Dear Judge Smith,

To any living individual who is criticized in our literature, we provide that individual with proof copies prior to publication and the opportunity to respond.

Please review the enclosed proof page 48 for Cassandra's Secret. That page mentions your name and criticizes your judicial work. We invite your input as to any possible errors or inaccuracies on that page. If valid, we shall make such corrections or adjustments before publication.

Please respond by our printing deadline of Monday, August 29, 1994. Thank you.

Sincerely,

John Flint
Editor

Next Page | Contents | The Heresy Site | Previous Page

Disclaimer - Copyright - Contact

Online: buildfreedom.org | terrorcrat.com / terroristbureaucrat.com