Next Page | Contents | The Heresy Site | Previous Page
THE FUTURE
(Justice for the Future)
|
1991 A.D.
AND
BEYOND into the WORLD OF INTEGRATED HONESTY
|
DOCUMENT #3 -- PREPARING FOR A JUST FUTURE
Supporting-Document #3 consists of the Honesty Motion and two subsequent Appeals filed in Federal Court during 1990 and 1991 as appeared in a series of three articles published in The Neo-Tech Report. That motion asks for the replacement of the truth oath with an oath to fully integrated honesty. The current truth oath lets judges, lawyers, plaintiffs, and defendants manipulate both facts and laws to unjust, harmful, egomaniacal, or self-aggrandizing ends. But held to an oath of fully integrated honesty, all purposeful manipulation of laws and facts would become perjured testimony when committed by witnesses...and illegal, condemnable, or appealable behavior when committed by judges or lawyers.The Honesty Motion protects the innocent and keeps the guilty from escaping justice. For, the Honesty Motion prevents the manipulation of laws and technicalities. The Honesty Motion is the harbinger of a mystic-free justice system in the coming, wide-scope accountability world of tomorrow -- the Golden World.
JUSTICE ASSURED THROUGH THE HONESTY MOTION
|
of THE HONESTY MOTION AND ITS TWO APPEALS
Prosecuting attorneys can also use the Honesty Motion to protect society from genuine criminals who damage others through guns, fists, force, fraud, or coercion. For example, with that motion, clever defense lawyers hired by dangerous or violent criminals can no longer "beat the law" on technicalities. The Honesty Motion is a powerful, legitimate tool to protect society from dishonest and destructive people, both in and out of government. ...The development of the Honesty Motion and its two Appeals was a major motive for the Socratic trial of Frank R. Wallace. Actual and potential defendants and plaintiffs as well as lawyers, prosecutors, judges, and law students may obtain free copies of the complete Honesty Motion and its two Appeals by writing Mr. Allen Kern at the Kenneth A. Clark Memorial Foundation, 850 South Boulder Highway, Henderson, NV 89015. ...Please include a self-addressed, 9" x 12" envelope stamped with $2.00 in postage, and a brief statement of reasons for requesting the Honesty Motion. |
copyright (c)1991
The Neo-Tech Report
| Below is an update on the evolving dynamics of the first Socratic trial in 2390 I years--The United States of America v. Frank R. Wallace. |
AFTER 2390 YEARS, THE HONESTY OATH WILL HELP RECTIFY
ALL DISHONEST LAWS AND INJUSTICES
|
After 2390 Years Neo-Tech will Redress the Trial, Jailing, and Execution of Socrates |
This is a motion to eliminate all oaths or affirmations oriented around truth, such as:
"Do you swear to tell the truth, the whole truth, and nothing but the truth, so help you God?"
This motion also requests that all oaths or affirmations be instead oriented around fully integrated honesty, such as:
"Do you affirm to speak with fully integrated honesty, only with fully integrated honesty, and nothing but fully integrated honesty?"
Telling the truth means nothing more than asserting a factual point or a series of factual points that are not untruths or lies. Truth implies neither responsibility to honesty nor responsibility to integrate facts into context. Moreover, the current oath or affirmation to truth is based on automated, noneffort, static assertions or a-point facts. And a-point facts alone are dependent neither on integrations with the whole of one's knowledge nor on the known essential point (or the point) of an issue. Thus, the point of an issue can be erased or hidden by clever but dishonest manipulations of truthful a-point facts.
A-point law bypasses the discipline and effort required for fully integrated honesty. But the-point law includes the responsibility of fully integrated honesty required to objectively prosecute the guilty, protect the innocent, and exercise incorruptible justice. As an example relevant to every court and justice system: The-point law is necessary to objectively determine who are the value destroyers in order to hold them accountable for their actions and penalize them for their destructions inflicted onto others and society. The-point law is also necessary to objectively determine who are the value producers in order to protect and reward them for the values they provide to others and society.
While no one can manipulate integra the-point law, any cleverly dishonest person can easily manipulate the facts and truths of fragma a-point law for destructive purposes. Such people use out-of-context facts, combined with a-point law, to subvert justice, integrity, and honesty in undermining our government, society, and all its citizens.
In all justice systems based on manipulative truth rather than incorruptible honesty, honest people must also maneuver, like in a chess game, a-point law in order to protect or defend themselves. And that demand for honest people to manipulate the law is the most insidiously harmful aspect of a-point justice systems.
For consistent, objective justice, an oath or affirmation must be based on the volitional, effort-driven, dynamic process of honesty. Honesty by nature demands full context and integrations with the whole of each individual's knowledge. Such full context honesty always leads to the essential point (or the point) of the issue under consideration. Honesty cannot be manipulated to serve dishonest purposes. Consequently, only honesty can consistently deliver objective justice as well as uphold objective ethical principles and integrity.
Truth Versus Honesty
1. Truth is a mushy, hydra-headed word. Everyone disputes its meaning. Truth denotes a static assertion that changes from person to person, opinion to opinion, culture to culture. Thus, truth is a hollow, manipulating word that lawyers, prosecutors, the law, and the courts can use to gain credibility for destructive actions and unjust legalities...be it President Nicolae Ceausescu's decorous courtrooms used to jail and execute thousands of innocent citizens for "political or economic crimes." Or Judge John M. Walker's decorous courtroom used for sentencing to jail one of the greatest value producers in America, businesswoman Leona Helmsley, on out-of-context a-point law to satisfy cries for crucifixion by a dishonest news medium and an envious public. ...By contrast, legal proceedings based on fully integrated honesty would prevent all such irrational actions and miscarriages of justice.
Truth is a weapon used in law and courts to develop arbitrary sets of preconditioned points of what is "good" or "bad." Then that "truth" is demanded from people in establishing those preconditioned points as the building basis of specious law and false justice. By nature, using such sets of non contextual points as the basis of any law is dishonest. And demanding the truth within each set of non contextual points allows unjust propaganda, force. jailings, and ultimately executions to expand without compunctions, challenges, or limits.
2. Honesty is a solid, indivisible word. No one disputes its meaning. Honesty is a hard-effort, volitional process that is identical for every conscious being. Thus, honesty is thinking and acting with fully integrated responsibility. But, all professional value destroyers must becloud the thinking and acting process of honesty and context in order to live off the productive efforts of others.
Honesty integrates beyond all preconditioned, dishonest a points in going straight to the point: Any statement, issue, or action is either honest or dishonest. In integrating beyond all manipulated preconditioned points of truth, the dynamics of honesty dissolve all unjust propaganda, force, legalities, jailings and executions from a Judge John M. Walker, Jr. to a President Nicolae Ceausescu.[ 86 ] Thus, fully integrated honesty dissolves all dishonest illusions, rejects all unjust propaganda, and prevents all destructive actions in legal and courtroom proceedings.
To serve, uphold, and advance justice...to uphold principle and integrity...to prevent miscarriages of justice in this and all other litigations of justice, the oath must be changed. All oaths and affirmations based on the word truth as well as all dishonest and manipulative uses of fragma a-point law must be discarded. The word honesty must be used in place of truth in order to deliver consistent, objective integra the-point justice in all areas of law. The recognition and granting of this motion is not only essential for justice in this current case, but will represent the most significant advance in providing consistent, incorruptible law and justice since the Magna Charta in 1215 A.D.
This honesty motion will become a turnkey motion that anyone can use in any court case. Not only can innocent people use this motion to protect themselves from destructive laws and abusive power, but prosecuting attorneys can also use this motion to protect society from real criminals. For example, with this motion, sharp defense lawyers for hardened criminals could no longer "beat the law" or "get around the law". With this motion, dangerous or violent criminals could no longer get off on technicalities. This motion becomes a powerful, legitimate tool for all honest people to protect themselves and society from dishonest and destructive people.
An Example of Corruptible A-Point Law Based on Truth
| Corruptible Justice Through Truth Oaths and A-Point Laws |
Incorruptible Justice through Fully Integrated Honesty Oaths and The-Point Laws |
| Illusions and Mind-Created Realities Conjured Up Through Manipulative, Unintegrated Truth Fragma A-Point Law |
Fully Integrated In-Context Facts Revealed Through Unmanipulative, Fully Integrated Honesty Integra The-Point Law |
| * Accused of violating specific a-point laws that involve criminal jail sentences. | * No rational or objective laws violated. No victims. No one is wrongfully harmed. Everyone including our government, country, and society benefit enormously every year from the Helmsleys -- more than from almost anyone else in history (along with other heroic producers of values, capital, and jobs -- people such as Andrew Carnegie, Thomas Edison, and Michael Milken. They are among the greatest benefactors of civilization). |
| * "Only little people pay taxes." The media and the Justice Department use that out-of-context quote to send Leona Helmsley to a "tough jail with a stiff sentence". The judge uses a-point law to look good for the media and be popular with the masses: Justice for the defendant is irrelevant; Perception by others is everything. | * Innocent, ironic rhetoric dishonestly taken 1800 out of context by the media, the prosecution, and the court to malign the value-producing and tax-paying giant Leona Helmsley. She is one of the biggest and best paying, individual customers of the IRS in history. ...She should be treated royally by the IRS, our government, and the public. |
| * Out-of-context condemnation of Leona Helmsley as cruel, heartless, greedy for her firing poorly or improperly performing employees. Without further integration or context, the judge concurs and allows the jury to make its decisions on such impressions. | * Takes responsibility for difficult, heroic, and courageous actions. Exercises the essence of justice. For honest justice is essential for building major competitive values for society and delivering productive livelihoods to tens of thousands of people. The Helmsleys are major benefactors of society who produce great competitive values for the American public. By contrast, her attackers in the media and justice system are envious malefactors incapable of producing net competitive values for others and society. |
| * Splash on the cover of Newsweek magazine during her trial the maliciously dishonest "Bitch Rhymes with Rich" headline with a slanderously malevolent feature article. | * Through the-point honesty, readers and advertisers alike will clearly recognize the envious slander and the malevolent ineptness of the editors and writers at Newsweek magazine. |
| * Allegedly avoids $1MM in taxes while paying $300MM - $500MM in taxes. Therefore, salaried murderers ruin her life, kill her husband, destroy her business, send her to jail. | * In-context honesty shows far below normal variations in calculations of tax deductions: Represents 0.5% of the total taxes paid. Normal variations are estimated at ten times that...or 5%. |
| * Set harsh example for all mega-value producers. In fact, set precedent and techniques for the professional value-destroyers to ruin other mega-value producers. Politicians are not held responsible for their destructively empowered a-point laws used to ruin Leona Helmsley. Thus, they continue their bogus livelihoods unscathed. ...Billions lost in tax revenues. Many billions lost in capital and job creation. Five times that amount in money-flow wealth lost to society. | * A more attentive accounting reveals the Helmsleys overpaid their taxes by $3MM rather than underpaid by $1MM. Tax refunds are filed and paid. The political-minded prosecutor and the criminal-minded IRS agents responsible for maliciously attacking the Helmsleys are fined, fired, and held responsible for damages to the Helmsleys, to the government, and to the IRS itself. Politicians responsible for the a-point laws used to attack the Helmsleys and others are identified and voted out of office. The judge is impeached. |
| * Prosecutor basks in unearned glory and power. He then runs for high political office, such as for Mayor of New York City. | * Prosecutor scorned and expelled from office. Ostracized from society until retribution is made to his past victims. |
| * Her life destroyed. Husband dies. Business crumbles. Tens of millions in tax revenue annually are lost to our government and society. But more important, billions of dollars in economic growth, values, jobs, and well-being are lost forever. | * Recognized and hailed as one of America's great benefactors. Business grows. Many millions more in tax revenue are collected every year. |
| The Honesty Motion proposal is currently being considered by the Ninth Circuit Federal District Court. Will the Honesty Motion be denied? ...Or will the Honesty Motion be permitted to eventually replace the traditional truth oath? The historic decision will be covered in detail here in next month's issue of The Neo-Tech Report as events unfold. |
Next Page | Contents | The Heresy Site | Previous Page
[ 86 ] On April 11, 1990, a short article in the back pages of the Wall Street Journal reported the execution deaths in communist China of four businessmen convicted of "economic crimes" against the state. Economic crimes? What exactly were their a-point crimes? Those businessmen were trying to deliver values to others and society by generating voluntary free trade and value exchange among people. That execution-death example is the ultimate end result of a-point law based on oaths of truth and manipulated by professional value destroyers.
Disclaimer - Copyright - Contact
Online: buildfreedom.org | terrorcrat.com / terroristbureaucrat.com