After evaluating all the evidence, biologist James Watson and biophysicist Francis Crick solved one of nature's greatest puzzles - the structure of the DNA molecule ... the genetic "blueprint" that dictates the traits which living things inherit.
Herbert A. Simon, Nobel Laureate, and his associates researched the human problem-solving process. |
Stage #6 : By now you should have a list of tentative solutions that are candidates for your educated guess or hypothesis.
Also, read Stage #8 to alert you as to how it will have to be challenged. & Other Methods of Evaluating
Be more careful and make your choice. Criteria can be graded by as many facets, characteristics or angles as you desire. You can have individual charts or a joint one. Tailor headings to fit your problem. |
Possible Comparison Chart | ||||||||
Tentative |
Test Results |
Suitability |
Feasibility |
Acceptability | ||||
#1 | #2 | #1 | #2 | #1 | #2 | #1 | #2 | |
Against | For | 30% | Okay | 60% | Okay | 50% | 90% | |
For | Against | 50% | No | 80% | No | 90% | 20% |
Time, money emergencies, importance, practicalbility, and constraints on human thinking often mean we can't be thorough enough, even though we would like to be.
Thus we must often settle for "good enough." similar descriptions are tolerance of ambiguity, aspiraton level, most optimum not needed, satisfactory versus optional standards, adequate for problem, risk within reason, bounded rationality.
The general principles in considering all your efforts:
Accept uncertainty of solution | Perfectionism is not always affordable |
"Truth" may not exist | Rate: Good--Better--Good enough |
Consider community "standards" | Precision - important in science |
Waste no time on little differences | No excuse for sloppy work |
No single best solution may exist | No better action to take |
A good base of actual experience or reading of toher people's experience will be of great value in making a quick decision on matters of minor importance, but remember ifyou makedecisions on wrong "facts," what follows are wrong decisions.
Learn to evaluate as - good, better, good enough, or not good enough - and search for further data keeping in mind costs vs. benefits.
Copyright © 2000, Norman W. Edmund - All Rights Reserved
Disclaimer - Copyright - Contact
Online: buildfreedom.org - terrorcrat.com - mind-trek.com